from sourceforge (disktype.sourceforge.net). That program is also included in your favorite package manager. It'll make it a bit easier to figure out where your
partitions are located. This is a sample output, using my newly converted image file. "disktype myimage.img"
Regular file, size 31.00 GiB (33286000640 bytes)
DOS/MBR partition map
Partition 1: 29.31 GiB (31473008640 bytes, 61470720 sectors from 2048, bootable)
Type 0x83 (Linux)
Ext3 file system
UUID 09DE2E1E-2C2F-4378-A8E6-59C8723865C7 (DCE, v4)
Volume size 29.31 GiB (31473008640 bytes, 7683840 blocks of 4 KiB)
Partition 2: 2.687 GiB (2884632576 bytes, 5634048 sectors from 61472768)
Type 0x82 (Linux swap / Solaris)
Linux swap, version 2, subversion 1, 4 KiB pages, little-endian
Swap size 2.687 GiB (2884624384 bytes, 704254 pages of 4 KiB)
>> ./configure --disable-darwin-user --disable-sdl --enable-cocoa --disable-kvm --disable-bsd-user
Then i directly converted a Windows 7 x64 created VHD image into a raw... well it's not done yet, but seems to be running fine. The latest qemu-img does understand the source file is .vhd and so the command I had to use is:
>> qemu-img convert -O raw source.vhd output.raw
next step is to use dd to lay down the raw image onto a hdd partition...
Basically it boils down to trying all the plausible offsets until you find the right oneWow! It is not needed! If you have cylinder-aligned partition, just skip 63*512 bytes. If you have megabyte-aligned, 1024*2*512.
1. look on the outside of the box, the activation code for use on kodakpulse.com is there - interesting, right?
2. log into kodakpulse, make some fake account (disposable/verifiable email address
3. register units that are still on the shelf for sale, send pics to them
4. someone you don't even know buys the units and sees YOUR pictures that you chose for them to see
could be offensive, or a scam (go here to win big = virus), or just for pure fun, etc
what do you think?
The error text comes from the CFNetwork framework. The question, is what is it inserting into or querying? Some sort of cache seems reasonable.
I read through the latest CFNetwork sources Apple has made available on their open source server, but these are pretty old (10.4?) and don't have these tests in them.
But at least it's a pointer.
This uses those orthogonal policies I mentioned above. It disturbs me a bit because if I ask the question "Who can access this bucket?" I have to go ask all of the users, which seems wrong.